Your clients are asking what AI says about them. Hand them the answer, weekly.
WhyIQ AI Radar measures whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI actually cite each of your clients on the questions their buyers ask. Every week ends in a white-label client report on a durable link: verdict, movement, verbatim AI quotes, and the plan. $149/mo includes 1 client, then $49/mo each additional.
"Does ChatGPT recommend us?" is now a client question. Most agencies answer it with a shrug.
Buyers increasingly start with an AI answer instead of ten blue links. When a client asks where they show up, pasting a prompt into ChatGPT once and screenshotting the reply is not measurement: the same prompt can produce a different answer an hour later.
And the work you are already billing for, the content, the entity cleanup, the review-site footprint, takes 4 to 8 weeks to land in AI answers. Without a weekly measured trend, that lag reads to the client as nothing happening. With one, it reads as a plan unfolding.
AI Radar gives you the defensible number: every client tracked weekly across all 5 engines, multi-pass so the data is a band rather than a coin flip, and a report that turns the trend into something a client actually reads. See exactly how it measures.
Built for the agency workflow, client by client.
One client included, add more at $49/mo
The $149/mo base covers 1 client domain. Each additional client is $49/mo, with its own workspace, prompt bank, and white-label report. No per-engine add-ons anywhere.
600 AI queries per client, weekly
40 buyer-intent prompts x 5 engines x 3 passes = 600 real queries per client every week. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI, all included.
3-pass confidence band
Every prompt runs 3 times per engine and the passes are averaged. The report says cited 2 of 3 passes, not a single-shot yes or no that flips next week.
White-label weekly client report
One durable link per client. Your branding, a plain-language verdict, what moved, verbatim AI quotes, the competing sources, and the plan. PDF export included.
Client portfolio dashboard
All clients on one screen, sorted so the ones that moved this week float to the top. Each opens on a plain-language This Week view, with Search Console style depth one click away.
Honest methodology, always visible
Every report carries a note on how the numbers were measured, including sample sizes. A steady week says steady. That honesty is what makes the number defensible in front of a client.
Open a client. Read where they stand in thirty seconds.
Every client in your portfolio opens on the same This Week view: is AI recommending them, what moved this week, who holds the answer slots they are missing, and the three actions to take. Click through to the prompts and any single-prompt deep-dive. This is the real product on sample data, not a mock.
Fernway Coffee
fernway.example
AI engines regularly recommend Fernway Coffee.
of 40 buyer questions had an AI answer citing you this week · typical range 4 to 26%
| Trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climbing | best specialty coffee subscriptionNon-brand | 40%+20% | 2+1 | #3.0+1 | |
| Climbing | best coffee for pour over at homeNon-brand | 20%+20% | 1+1 | #5.0-- | |
| Slipping | coffee subscription gift ideasNon-brand | 0%-20% | 0-1 | -- |
4 steady promptsstill cited, a held position this week
| Trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steady | Fernway Coffee reviewsBrand | 100%· 0% | 2 | #1.0 | |
| Steady | Fernway Coffee subscription priceBrand | 100%· 0% | 1 | #1.0 | |
| Steady | freshest coffee beans deliveredNon-brand | 40%· 0% | 2 | #1.0+1 | |
| Steady | how to buy coffee that was roasted this weekNon-brand | 20%· 0% | 1 | #3.0+1 |
3 not citedno AI answer cited you: the biggest pool of opportunity
| Trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not cited | single origin coffee roasters worth tryingNon-brand | 0%· 0% | 0 | -- | |
| Not cited | coffee subscription with free shippingNon-brand | 0%· 0% | 0 | -- | |
| Not cited | best small batch coffee roasters onlineNon-brand | 0%· 0% | 0 | -- |
- reddit.com holds 10 answer slots you are missing. It is a community, so presence there is buildable.Where: r/pourover, thread "roasters that surprised you this year", winning "single origin coffee roasters worth trying".In that answer the AI named Heart, Sey.
- ChatGPT cites you most: 4 of 9 answers this week.
- Google AI has not cited you on any of its 8 answers yet. Google AI favors crawlable server-rendered pages on the Google index with a direct first-paragraph answer.
Build presence in r/Coffee and r/pourover
Reddit holds the Perplexity answer slot on your highest-value category question, and Perplexity leans on community threads more than any other engine.
Do: Get Fernway named authentically in the active specialty-coffee threads, then earn a mention in the next r/Coffee subscription round-up.
Based on: Based on: reddit.com cited on "single origin coffee roasters worth trying" and "best small batch coffee roasters online", Fernway absent on both.
Publish a specialty-subscription comparison page
ChatGPT and Gemini pull comparison and round-up content into their answers, and right now tradecoffee.com and wirecutter.com own those slots.
Do: Ship a genuinely useful "best specialty coffee subscriptions" comparison that names Fernway alongside the alternatives, with real specifics.
Based on: Based on: tradecoffee.com and wirecutter.com hold the comparison slots on 4 of your non-brand questions.
Reinforce the freshness angle where you already win
You are cited first on the freshness questions. Doubling down on the proof behind that claim protects the slot and can carry it to the engines that miss you.
Do: Add roast-to-door timing proof to the pages engines already cite, so the freshness lead compounds instead of eroding.
Based on: Based on: cited on "freshest coffee beans delivered" for 12 consecutive weeks, absent on the same question on Gemini and Google AI.
Every week ends in something you can put in front of a client.
One durable white-label link per client. A plain-language verdict, what moved, what the AI actually said verbatim, who holds the answer slots you are missing, and the plan. Your branding, your name on it, numbers frozen per week. This is the real report component with sample data, not a mock.
What the AI actually said
Verbatim excerpts from this week's AI answers: where Fernway Coffee was cited or named, and where an answer sent the reader to a rival instead.
CitedThe AI answer linked to your site as a source. This is the win: the engine did not just know about you, it pointed the reader to you.ChatGPT answering "best specialty coffee subscription" “For freshness-focused buyers, Fernway Coffee is a strong pick: beans ship within 48 hours of roasting and the subscription lets you pause or reschedule from a single dashboard.”
CitedThe AI answer linked to your site as a source. This is the win: the engine did not just know about you, it pointed the reader to you.ChatGPT answering "Fernway Coffee reviews" “Fernway Coffee reviews consistently highlight the roast-date transparency and a subscription that is easy to pause, with most complaints limited to limited decaf options.”
A methodology footer states how the numbers were measured, with sample sizes. On Agency it reads: each question ran 3 times per engine and the results were averaged into a confidence band. A steady week says steady. That honesty is what makes the number defensible in front of a client.
The audit wins the engagement. Radar keeps it.
AI Radar is one half of the WhyIQ agency stack. The other is the WhyIQ Scanner: white-label CRO audits that simulate 50 visitors on a client page and report why they leave. Agencies open with the audit as the paid diagnostic, then attach Radar as the recurring proof behind the monthly retainer. Two subscriptions, both self-serve, every price published.
See the white-label CRO audit →About $30 per client per month. Billed to you, resold your way.
3-pass confidence band on every check. So the data is not single-shot noise.
- 1 client domain included, then $49/mo per additional client
- 40 prompts per domain, 5 engines, 3 passes
- White-label weekly client reports + PDF export
- Per-client workspaces + weekly scan emails
- Cancel anytime
Run one check on a client domain first. No account needed.
- 8 sample prompts × 5 AI engines
- Citation Score + per-engine grid
- Competitor leaderboard, top 5
- Results emailed in about 10 minutes
Full tier comparison, including the $29/mo SMB plan for single-brand tracking, on the AI Radar pricing page.
Agency questions, straight answers.
Is the client report really white-label?
Yes. The weekly report carries your logo, agency name, accent color, and contact details. On the Agency tier you can switch off the small WhyIQ credit in the footer, so the report itself contains no WhyIQ branding at all. The PDF export is generated from the same page, so it is fully white-label too. One honest caveat: the web share link currently lives on a whyiq.ai address (custom domains are not available yet), so the PDF is the delivery path when the URL itself must carry your brand.
How is this different from the white-label CRO audit?
They are the two halves of the agency stack. The WhyIQ Scanner audit is a one-off diagnostic: why a page loses visitors and what to fix. AI Radar is ongoing measurement: whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI actually cite your client, tracked weekly with a client-ready report each cycle. Agencies typically sell the audit to win the engagement and use Radar to justify the monthly retainer.
How quickly will a client see movement?
Honestly: off-page work usually takes 4 to 8 weeks to show up in AI citations. That is exactly why the report is weekly and trend-based. In between citation wins, it surfaces the leading signals that move first, like brand mention rate and position shifts inside AI answers, and on a genuinely steady week it says so rather than inventing movement.
Why does Agency run every check 3 times?
AI engines are probabilistic. Ask the same question twice and you can get two different answers, so a single-shot check reports noise as a verdict. The Agency tier runs every prompt on every engine 3 times each week and averages the passes into a confidence band. If a number is going in front of a client, it should be one you can defend.
What does it cost per client?
The Agency tier is $149/mo and includes 1 client domain with the full toolkit. Each additional client is $49/mo and gets the same full treatment: 40 tracked prompts across all 5 AI engines with the 3-pass band, their own workspace, a weekly scan email, and the white-label weekly report. Cancel anytime, 7-day refund window on checkout.
Put the first report in front of a client next week.
Start Agency with your first client, add more at $49/mo each, and the first weekly cycle produces a white-label report per client. Or look at the sample first: fictional client, real product.